5 Myths About Construction Cameras and Jobsite Monitoring

There are many misconceptions and outright myths about the value of construction cameras and jobsite monitoring. Construction theft costs construction businesses $300 million – $1 billion annually. What is worse however is that fewer than 25% of items stolen from a construction site are ever recovered. The news, of course, gets worse: Construction theft increases each year by about 10%. Let’s dig in a bit deeper on the myths of construction cameras and job site monitoring. 

First Myth: Construction Cameras Alone Can Prevent Crime 

In a perfect world, a construction camera alone might be enough to deter even the most determined thieves. This is possibly the biggest myth in the industry and one that is hard to dispel. There are many reasons why construction cameras alone cannot prevent crime including that most determined offenders believe (and often rightly so) that the technology produces poor image quality and the chances of being identified using construction site camera recordings wouldn’t be good enough to make a positive identification.  

The reality is that even a high-definition video surveillance system is only as good as the technology that supports it. Job site monitoring solutions that feature high-definition images and video, data analysis, and artificial intelligence are a much better solution to prevent not only theft but job site accidents and safety issues. 

Even Fake Construction Cameras are Effective 

Among the most dangerous ideas is that the illusion of camera coverage with fake cameras will deter crime. If you are of the mindset that even real cameras aren’t an effective deterrent to thieves, then fake cameras are even less likely to be effective. Toss in the fact that fake cameras will give staff a false sense of security, and you’re just asking for real trouble with fake cameras. 

Obviously, with such a slim profit margin on a construction project, saving money where you can is an attractive proposition. Of course, if your fake cameras don’t stop thieves from targeting your construction assets, you’re out not only the cost of your fake cameras but also whatever the value of the stolen property (not to mention losing peace of mind and the extra time that will be required to recover from your stolen assets). 

When Theft Has Occurred, Adding Cameras Will Prevent Future Issues  

Whenever something bad happens, be it a break-in or an accident, many construction site administrators believe that installing construction site cameras suddenly fixes security and safety issues. While it is an easy way to show your employees or your investors that the organization is committed to improving safety and security, without a solid job site security plan and the resources to fix issues, cameras probably aren’t going to be the silver bullet some folks think they are. 

A better solution would be to investigate what went wrong before you invest in surveillance cameras. In some cases, cameras alone wouldn’t have prevented the theft or accident. That is why it is important to get an outside professional to survey the construction site and offer solutions that fit your project’s specific needs.  

Construction Cameras Alone Effectively Safeguard Your Job Site 

It isn’t enough to buy a few cameras and place them strategically on the perimeter of your job site. The most effective theft prevention plan is built on the fundamentals of security and crime prevention known by security professionals as “defense-in-depth.”  

This concept states that to effectively reduce the risk of theft, a security plan must address four key goals: Prevention, Control, Detection, and Intervention. Essentially a solid security plan includes many layers, some of which may be considered redundant:  

  • An employee uses a key card to enter a job site.  
  • A security guard keeps watch at the gate. 
  • Security cameras record all movements on the job site, at the entrances and storage areas. 
  • An employee must use their key card to access storage areas or office spaces. 

Depending on the job site, there may be even more layers protecting valuables and personnel. The trick is of course to walk the fine line between security and inconvenience. Choosing a job site monitoring platform that uses a variety of technologies to minimize risk is why SiteKick is quickly becoming a leader in construction technology. 

All Construction Cameras and Monitoring Systems are Equally Effective 

A common mistake construction firms make when making the decision to implement a job site monitoring solution is believing they’re all the same, using the same technology and skillsets. The unflattering truth is that many job site monitoring companies rely too much on hardware and not enough on the software systems that aid humans in securing a construction site.  

The best solution starts with a conversation about your specific needs, not with an array of camera choices. Ideally, the solution integrates well with software platforms you’re already using, like Procore, and does more for you than just managing and controlling your cameras. 

If you’re interested in raising your job site’s security to new heights and are looking for ways to improve safety, efficiency, and data analysis, contact SiteKick for a free demonstration today.  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *